Chelsea 3-1 Arsenal
Apologies in advance, because this is a pun-free, humourless post. â€œI wonder if you could stick a gag in?â€ asked Mrs Lower as she read it. Iâ€™ll see what I can do.
Are sure as eggs are eggs, Arsenal sank to their annual defeat at Stamford Bridge with barely a whimper. In terms of the title – thatâ€™s all folks; though in terms of performances the writing has been on the wall for some time.
First though, Chelsea. They were fantastic yesterday and have been fantastic since September, leaving everyone – not just us – well and truly in their wake. They defend as a unit, pick off their opponents and are relentlessly good at it. For an Arsenal fan, comparing the two sides yesterday was painful, especially as – unlike Chelsea sides of yore – there are fewer players to dislike.
There surely have to be doubts about the validity of the first goal, but few pundits or commentators seemed that fussed by it. Odd, no? Bellerin was flattened by Alonsoâ€™s elbow before he headed it in and I suspect that would have been blown as a foul anywhere else on the pitch.
To add insult to potential head injury, Bellerin was forced to retire with Gabriel replacing him. It was a double blow, because while Gabriel is an OK backup central defender, he really is no right back.
Would it have been different had we taken one of the few chances we had? There was one for Iwobi early on, a very presentable header for Gabriel and a great chance for Ozil.
I suspect not. It was a day when we really needed to step up but too many of our players were depressingly absent. Ozil and Sanchez, our two superstars, were two of the worst culprits. The former was peripheral while the latter cut a lonely and frustrated (and frustrating) figure.
Walcott was ineffective and didnâ€™t defend, Iwobi faded, Coquelin was utterly overwhelmed and to cap it all off Petr Cech picked a bad day for a howler. We were at best ineffective yesterday, and at worst disorganised, error prone and playing off the cuff.
A horse walks into a bar. The barman looks at him and asks, â€˜Why the long face?â€™
Our 3-0 win earlier in the season – our best performance of the season – was the outlier. Because overall, when the chips are down against sides that we like to compare ourselves against, we have been poor.
Arsenal v the top seven
Scored first 5
Pts dropped from winning positions 11
— Orbinho (@Orbinho) February 4, 2017
And our record at Stamford Bridge since our 5-3 win in 2011 also speaks for itself. Weâ€™ve lost every time with an aggregate score of 15-2.
The title is as good as over. Even if Chelsea collapsed, weâ€™d have to go on a barnstorming run. Neither looks remotely likely. Maybe the boss can pull something out of the hat in the Champions League? Past performance would suggest otherwise.
The fact is that year after year, irrespective of the players, we are too often making the same mistakes. We let in silly goals. We disappear too often. We arenâ€™t prepared well enough. We are inconsistent. We are predictable. We switch off.
And that, of course, rests at the doorstep of Arsene Wenger. Martin Keown said after the game that he believed Wenger would sign a new two-year deal. The boss stands alone at being able to get us into the top four, but taking us to the next level? That now seems beyond him.
Will he really take that deal? Iâ€™m not so sure he will. To me it feels like the team needs a massive dose of the smelling salts. It needs a new broom to sweep through it and it needs new ideas. I donâ€™t know many Arsenal fans who think Wenger will be the man to do that. But in the end, because of the incredible power he wields within the club, perhaps the more pertinent question is: Does Wenger still think heâ€™s the man to do that?
â€œWe want you to stay,â€ sang the Chelsea fans with mirth. I wonder if he heard.