Arsenal 2-2 Manchester City
It was one of those games where disappointment at the final whistle pretty quickly morphed into satisfaction. It was our best performance of the season so far – though it wasnâ€™t quite enough to see off the champions.
It was all about Welbeck before the match (no, Iâ€™m not shortening his name and adding a zed, before you ask, and nor shall I be referring to him as â€˜that chapâ€™). His name got the loudest roar as the line-ups were read out. I think he had a decent debut, though he faded a bit in the second half. He wasnâ€™t the only one to be fair.
It would have been an even better debut had his chipped effort, which lofted over the Head and Shoulders of Hart, hadnâ€™t bounced back off the post. Should he have hit the target there? Harsh – he had the goalie thundering out at him and in the circumstances he did the right thing.
Our weakness was down the left, with Monreal playing fast and loose with the notion of left back. We got away with it once when City counter-attacked down that side, but not a second time: Nigel Flamini was involved at the start and finish of the move.
Step in Jack Wilshere, who played as well as Iâ€™ve seen him play in a year or two. He and Sanchez were absolutely superb all game. Jack was always looking to go forward and seems to have found that extra yard of pace that was missing at times last season. He was such a menace City upended him on plenty of occasions (something they did systematically when Arsenal broke or approached the area). Pellegrini had steam coming out his ears at the end of the game, moaning about fouls in the run-up to both our goals. All the while handily ignoring his own sideâ€™s methods to break up play. City are very streetwise, and if thatâ€™s what weâ€™re becoming, then amen to that. About time too.
Wilshereâ€™s goal was a joy, a blur of pass and move and a bounce of pace to make Clichy look like a fool. Which is always nice.
Sanchez was immense too, his energy often putting his teammates to shame. Where does he get that drive from? Bottle it and sell it and youâ€™d be a millionaire. Weâ€™ve got a lot of attacking talent at the club, and heâ€™s fast becoming the one you simply canâ€™t drop. Low centre of gravity, incredibly skill in tight spaces, an eye for goal and amazing tenacity. And what a strike.
Booked for taking your shirt off. Iâ€™ve always disliked that rule, when people tug and nick at people and feign injury and dive without so much as a by-your-leave from the ref. Pah.
Downsides? I thought Ozil was a passenger until quite late on when he found a burst of energy. His body language, always hard to decipher at the best, spoke of frustration. That translated to the stands. He didnâ€™t look that fit. Ramsey too looked less dynamic than usual.
At the back, we let our fourth headed goal of the season in (topping the table in that regard), and Wenger was happy enough to concede that we need a bit of work in that area. We were defensively suspect for both goals.
Then thereâ€™s Debuchy, who went down in agony, thumping the turf. â€œYou wouldnâ€™t go down like that if it wasnâ€™t badâ€ suggested Shedman. â€œGiroud does it all the timeâ€, said my brother. Nothingâ€™s broken, but itâ€™s a bad sprain and weâ€™re now down to the bare bones at the back.
In fact his injury came at a very bad time. I thought we lost concentration during the time he was treated and a bit of momentum, and Cityâ€™s equaliser felt like it was coming before it did. Frustrating.
In the end, we could have lost it with City hitting both posts, so we canâ€™t be too upset. One win and three draws, six points from twelve. I wouldnâ€™t read too much into any of that. The main thing is that weâ€™ve picked up some form and wobbly defence aside, weâ€™ve got some incredible attacking depth. Weâ€™ll need to fit Walcott back in at some point.
Nice problem to have.